There are many different ways to approach usability testing these days… lab-based testing, online surveys, field research and self-videoing testing to name just a few. While all have their place in the UX world, you need to consider carefully which methodology you choose. Pick incorrectly and you are likely to end up with low-quality insights and wasted time and money.
Let's take a look at two of the most common types of usability testing...
Pros: very high-quality, in-depth feedback on a website as a whole and great insight into user needs that can inform website strategy
Cons: can be expensive and normally takes a couple of weeks to get insights
Pros: super quick - tester feedback can be gathered within hours - and great for gaining highly targeted insights from broad consumer groups
Cons: difficult to test prototypes, can't probe for further insight, testers might be 'experts' and not give genuine user feedback
While both these approaches might work, sometimes we find our clients want something that combines the best of both worlds.
In these cases, we can offer ‘Quick and dirty’ testing. This approach combines many of the advantages of moderated, lab-based usability testing with the speed and cost of unmoderated, remote testing.
Fast-paced, targeted testing of a website or app with real users in moderated sessions. These can be conducted in person or remotely, depending on who the testers are.
The approach is best used for small scale, tactical research when you need insights fast. For example:
A round of Web Usability ‘Quick and dirty’ usability testing starts from £1000 and includes:
Interested? Read more about 'quick and dirty' usability testing and get in touch with our UX Consultant, Lucy at lucy@webusability.co.uk for more information!
Read more: What is the purpose of usability testing, Usability testing methods - all in moderation