We have recently been head down supporting public sector organisations as they work towards meeting the latest accessibility guidelines.
This has had us crawling over many a government, NHS and local council website and you know what they all have in common: PDFs.
PDFs are rife on these websites and hours spent assessing their accessibility has confirmed our long established opinion that they should be avoided at all costs!
Here’s some of the reasons why…
PDFs have a habit of being created and then forgotten. They lurk in corners of websites and gather dust, misleading users with out of date information. If you do try to update them, you first have to find the original version of the document, which can often be an impossible task.
Unlike html web pages, PDFs are not responsive, which means they are horrible to use on mobile devices. The text is small, requiring pinching and zooming and two-way scrolling. Tables are impossible to use, links too small to activate accurately and images and graphics that lose all meaning as users cannot see the detail.
PDFs are inherently inaccessible to users with disabilities and require a lot more work than html web pages to make them accessible, including:
Even with all these adjustments, PDFs can still be difficult for many users and are often avoided…
We’re not the only ones who hate PDFs. Users are not big fans either. PDFs are perceived as being hard work, content heavy and generally not worth the effort. On many occasions we have seen testers in usability sessions sigh with resignation or immediately navigate away from a page that forces them into a PDF.
Present content as a html webpage, unless PDF is the only possible solution.
If PDFs are retained, take the following steps to ensure they are as usable and accessible as possible…
Read more: Common accessibility fails;Web Accessibility: Guidance and the Law